Barnet Council workers are planning to take strike action on

Wednesday 8 July.

Our newspaper Barnet VOICE explains why here

Lots of people have asked how they can support the campaign.

Here are 8 ways you can help.

1. Please sign our petition https://t.co/rMyBAeVDOQ

2. Pop down to our picket lines, details here

3. Promote our campaign song “The easyCouncil Loco-motion” https://youtu.be/Wi0bdgofsmM

4. Promote this animation about how Austerity is impacting our community. https://youtu.be/YQ5t63fSu-s

5. Follow us on Twitter here https://twitter.com/barnet_unison

6. Follow us on Facebook here https://www.facebook.com/pages/Barnet-Unison-branch/476910392463004 and like our page and share our posts.

7. Please send messages of solidarity & support to contactus@barnetunison.org.uk

8. Please send donations to Barnet UNISON office at contactus@barnetunison.org.uk

Competition – three, two, one

Three original bidders reduced to two when EC Harris LLP withdrew just before the procurement dialogue process began. In late June Capita Business Services Ltd withdraw because “…this particular opportunity did not provide the right fit with their Entrust (Staffordshire) business model.” This leaves Cambridge Education (Mott MacDonald) with no competition, because Barnet Council made a decision not to develop an in-house option.

Subcontracting of catering confirmed

Our earlier report in June predicted the ‘Threat of large-scale subcontracting’ which proved correct when Capita and Mott MacDonald revealed catering subcontractors.

http://www.barnetunison.me.uk/sites/default/files/Barnet%20Education%20&%20Skills%20subcontracting_0.pdf

Mott MacDonald, not Barnet Council, selected ISS to be its catering subcontractor.

New key issues

1. The lack of competition seriously undermines the credibility of the procurement process and places Barnet Council in a weak negotiating position. Obtaining Best Value in these circumstances is highly unlikely.

2. It is evident the Catering Service is included in the contract for the “…viability of the venture” (Council response to our earlier report). In other words, the justification is financial, not operational synergy. Catering makes a relatively large net contribution to the Council budget and potential additional income is nearly twice that of the services included in the contract. This reinforces our recommendation that Catering should be retained in-house.

3. Subcontracting catering means savings will be split three-ways with Barnet Council sandwiched between two global contractors of Mott MacDonald and ISS.

4. The Council chose not to disclose to councillors, staff and the trade unions that ISS were are already involved in the Dialogue.

5. UNISON is concerned that low paid catering workers will bear the brunt of the demand for efficiency savings and profits leading to changes to terms and conditions and a two-tier workforce.

6. The quality of school meals could be threatened.

7. The current situation raises entirely new risks, which must be identified, allocated and estimated as a matter of urgency and reported to the Children, Education, Libraries and Safeguarding Committee.

8. Has Cambridge Education (Mott MacDonald) any experience in managing a global catering contractor like ISS? Will the Council have to monitor the subcontractor either directly or through Cambridge Education or Mott MacDonald? The Council is already having to create more posts within commissioning in order to effectively monitor the growing number of contractors. This is adding to the cost of outsourcing and reinforces UNISON’s previous view that the ‘thin client’ does not work.

9. We strongly recommend the Council postpone the procurement process and exclude the Catering Service from the JVC option and retain in-house.

Competition – three, two, one

Three original bidders reduced to two when EC Harris LLP withdrew just before the procurement dialogue process began. In late June Capita Business Services Ltd withdraw because “…this particular opportunity did not provide the right fit with their Entrust (Staffordshire) business model.” This leaves Cambridge Education (Mott MacDonald) with no competition, because Barnet Council made a decision not to develop an in-house option.

Subcontracting of catering confirmed

Our earlier report in June predicted the ‘Threat of large-scale subcontracting’ which proved correct when Capita and Mott MacDonald revealed catering subcontractors.

http://www.barnetunison.me.uk/sites/default/files/Barnet%20Education%20&%20Skills%20subcontracting_0.pdf

Mott MacDonald, not Barnet Council, selected ISS to be its catering subcontractor.

New key issues

1. The lack of competition seriously undermines the credibility of the procurement process and places Barnet Council in a weak negotiating position. Obtaining Best Value in these circumstances is highly unlikely.

2. It is evident the Catering Service is included in the contract for the “…viability of the venture” (Council response to our earlier report). In other words, the justification is financial, not operational synergy. Catering makes a relatively large net contribution to the Council budget and potential additional income is nearly twice that of the services included in the contract. This reinforces our recommendation that Catering should be retained in-house.

3. Subcontracting catering means savings will be split three-ways with Barnet Council sandwiched between two global contractors of Mott MacDonald and ISS.

4. The Council chose not to disclose to councillors, staff and the trade unions that ISS were are already involved in the Dialogue.

5. UNISON is concerned that low paid catering workers will bear the brunt of the demand for efficiency savings and profits leading to changes to terms and conditions and a two-tier workforce.

6. The quality of school meals could be threatened.

7. The current situation raises entirely new risks, which must be identified, allocated and estimated as a matter of urgency and reported to the Children, Education, Libraries and Safeguarding Committee.

8. Has Cambridge Education (Mott MacDonald) any experience in managing a global catering contractor like ISS? Will the Council have to monitor the subcontractor either directly or through Cambridge Education or Mott MacDonald? The Council is already having to create more posts within commissioning in order to effectively monitor the growing number of contractors. This is adding to the cost of outsourcing and reinforces UNISON’s previous view that the ‘thin client’ does not work.

9. We strongly recommend the Council postpone the procurement process and exclude the Catering Service from the JVC option and retain in-house.

To view flyer click here

Dear Colleagues

I am writing to all of our members in relation to the latest news that Capita has pulled out of the contract talks.

I think it important to set out what has happened in the last six months.

On 31 January 2015 Barnet Council put out an invitation to tender for Education & Skills and School Meals services which you can view here

http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:36188-2015:TEXT:EN:HTML

The contract was advertised & valued from £89 million up to £986 million.

The tender received only three bids from:

1. Capita Business Services Ltd

2. EC Harris LLP

3. Mott MacDonald Ltd, trading as Cambridge Education

However, just before the contract talks began EC Harris LLP mysteriously dropped out and this is what the Council had to say:

“As you are aware, we commenced dialogue with our bidders last week.  One of our bidders (EC Harris) withdrew from the process shortly before dialogue commenced.  Whilst this is obviously disappointing, it is not unusual in this sort of procurement and I’m pleased to report that discussions with the remaining two bidders have been very positive and interesting so far.”

UNISON was concerned about the lack of bidders and sent a report to councillors outlining our concerns and calling for a postponement of the process.

You can read what we had to say here and read the response from the Council here

On Wednesday 24 June staff working for Education & Skills received an email from the Council explaining that:

“Capita Business Services Ltd submitted a letter withdrawing from the procurement process, as they had concluded that this particular opportunity did not provide the right fit with their Entrust business model.”

They went on to add:

“It is recognised that this may raise questions about the lack of competitive tension in the process and the subsequent ability of the Council to test best value from the final tender.  However, it is not unusual for competitive dialogue procurements to end up with a single bidder and there are various robust means through which we can test best value.”

In our meeting on Wednesday 24 June UNISON made it clear to officers that going ahead with the privatisation talks with just one contractor was clearly wrong. Furthermore we added that to go ahead simply reinforces the feelings of the workforce that the Council is wedded to outsourcing even when the market is clearly saying that there is very little interest. Only outsourcing fundamentalists would argue that Best Value can be achieved under these circumstances.

UNISON advised officers we will be submitting an emergency report to Councillors requesting that the process is postponed.

Why the secrecy about the subcontractor?

In our meeting yesterday we were informed global giant ISS will be taking over our Catering Services and that they have been involved in the contract talks all along. UNISON expressed our disappointment this had not been shared with staff in the recent staff briefing or been shared with councillors on the Children’s, Education, Libraries, Safeguarding Committee.

The confirmation of the news about the subcontractor reinforces our concern that low paid members will be targeted to deliver savings which will now have to be split three ways i.e. Barnet Council, Mott Macdonald & ISS.

I will continue to update our members on any new developments.

Please note our next day of strike action is likely to be Wednesday 8 July.

On 31 January 2015 Barnet Council put out invitation to tender for Education & Skills and School Meals services which you can view here

http://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:36188-2015:TEXT:EN:HTML

The contract was advertised & valued from £89 million up to £986 million.

The tender received only three bids from:

1. Capita Business Services Ltd

2. EC Harris LLP

3. Mott MacDonald Ltd, trading as Cambridge Education.

However, just before the contract talks began EC Harris LLP mysteriously dropped out and this is what the Council had to say:

“As you are aware, we commenced dialogue with our bidders last week.  One of our bidders (EC Harris) withdrew from the process shortly before dialogue commenced.  Whilst this is obviously disappointing, it is not unusual in this sort of procurement and I’m pleased to report that discussions with the remaining two bidders have been very positive and interesting so far.”

UNISON was concerned about the lack of bidders and sent a report to councillors outlining our concerns and calling for a postponement of the process.

You can read what we had to say here and read the response from the Council below:

“Further to your email of 8^th June 2015 and Councillor Thompstone’s response of the same date, Councillor Thompstone has asked me to provide a more detailed response to the points raised in the paper you circulated.

Firstly, in respect of the Outline Business Case and financial modelling, these were considered at the Children, Education, Libraries and Safeguarding Committee meeting in January.  At that meeting, it was made clear to Members of the Committee that the modelling was based on a series of assumptions that were set out in the Outline Business Case.  It was also made clear that the only way of testing these assumptions further and reaching an informed view would be to undertake a procurement exercise and that is the process that we are in at the moment.  I therefore see no basis on which we would benefit from revisiting either the Outline Business Case or the financial modelling at this stage in the process.  The outcomes of the procurement exercise will be set out in a Full Business Case, which will be presented to the Committee in November in order for the Committee to make an informed decision on the way forward.

Moving on to your concerns regarding sub-contracting, I can assure you that any contractual arrangements that come out of this procurement exercise would not permit sub-contracting of any part of the service without the prior agreement of the Council.  Furthermore, the competitive dialogue process requires bidders to set out their proposals for delivering services throughout the life of the contract, including the use of sub-contractors, and these proposals will be tested in full as part of that process.  The contract itself will also include robust arrangements for the management of any sub-contractor arrangements.

As Councillor Thompstone indicated in his email, it is our view that keeping all of these services together will provide the most coherent and integrated offer to schools and that excluding the catering service could reduce the viability of the venture.  This will also be tested as part of the competitive dialogue process.

The Equalities Impact Assessment is a “live” document that is updated throughout the process.  We are currently in the process of updating our detailed HR data and this will feed into an update of the Assessment, as will the outcomes of Outline Solutions.  The Assessment will continue to be updated throughout the process, with a final version being included in the Full Business Case.

It would be our intention to include arrangements for profit-sharing, open book accounting and an annual report in the contract in any event and these would apply equally to any sub-contractor.  Within Mr Whitfield’s paper, these suggestions are linked to concerns regarding there only being two bidders.  We are not seeking to appoint the cheapest bidder here, nor are bidders just competing against each other. Bids will be assessed against the evaluation criteria that we have set (of which 30% relates to financial benefit) and the successful bidder will need to meet all of the objectives that have been set for the project relating to service quality, engagement with schools and the delivery of the MTFS savings.”

It is interesting to note there is no mention of a subcontractor taking part in the talks.

To find out what happened next read Education Privatisation Saga Part Two.

Dear John,

I’m writing to send solidarity to Barnet Council Unison in its fight to stop the outsourcing and privatisation of services. Unison members at the Youth Offending Service and Targeted Youth Support invited Helen Davies to one of our recent shop meetings, where we learned of your campaign. In response we held a coffee and cake morning last week where our members baked cakes and sold them to raise money for your dispute and workers at the National Gallery, also fighting privatisation. We raised £100 and have split the money, giving you £50.

We are absolutely opposed to the way public services and public sector workers are being attacked. We chose our professions because we value young people and believe that given the right support and opportunity, they can make changes in their lives for the better. The increase in workloads and cuts that have reduced young people’s services have made it harder for workers to support young people adequately to change. To know that we are doing it with an 18% pay cut over the last 5 years, adds insult to injury.

We feel that further privatisation and outsourcing will lead to a worsening situation in our ability to maintain our own pay and terms and conditions at work and deliver a meaningful service. The agenda to privatise is gathering pace and it is to your absolute credit that you have decided to take a stand. Our contribution, though small, is accompanied by a message of sincere solidarity and to say we stand with you in your fight.

Jo Cardwell

Unison shop steward, Islington YOS

In a meeting with staff working for Education & Skills last week , UNISON heard that Unified Pay timetable has slipped significantly and is unlikely to be ready before March 2016.

I can confirm that UNISON is still taking part in work on the new grades for all the jobs including those based in our community schools.

Once the Council is ready to release the details of the new grading, UNISON will be organising borough wide meetings with our members to discuss the proposals.

Please keep a look out for our updates on Unified Pay.

 

John Burgess

Branch Secretary

Barnet UNISON