UNISON response to the Children’s Services Restructure

Dear Robert

RE: UNISON response to the Children’s Services Restructure

I recognise that you provided an updated version to the Trade Unions last Friday, as this has not been circulated to the workforce our response is based on the original proposal. Please find enclosed UNISON alternative proposal to the Children’s Services Restructure. Our proposal is based on the widespread responses from UNISON members working in Children’s Services.

It is important in these stark economic times, with the ongoing criticism of the number of senior management posts and high salaries in the public sector, that we avoid top heavy management structures. Our proposal has only 3 senior management roles as opposed to the 5 in your proposal.

To read full report click here

Children’s Services Restructure – DRAFT Briefing

Dear Colleague

Please find enclosed UNISON alternative proposal to the Children’s Services Restructure. Our proposal is based on the widespread responses from UNISON members working in Children’s Services. We are intending on submitting our proposal to the Director but want members to discuss and respond to our draft.

To view click here

It is important in these stark economic times, with the ongoing criticism of the number of senior management posts and high salaries in the public sector, that we avoid top heavy management structures. Our proposal has only 3 senior management roles as opposed to the 5 in the Directors’ proposal.

Children’s Services is the most high profile service the Council delivers and the consequences of poor performance are exceedingly high. The Climbié & Baby Peter inquiries are a constant reminder of what is at stake. It is our view and the view of our members that the proposed restructure is potentially dangerous and could undermine the already excellent safeguarding and social work practice being delivered by staff.  The Social Work Task Force said the ‘voice of social care’ needs to be heard within Children’s Services. It is our view the Directors proposal does the opposite. The restructure lowers the social care profile across the service which makes the structure unsafe. It is vitally important there is a strong Safeguarding oversight across the whole of the Children’s workforce as more and more services are carrying out work with vulnerable children and their families. It is worth remembering that the Climbié inquiry reinforced the need for integrated approach which we believe the Directors restructure does the opposite. 

The Directors restructure is based on an outdated silo approach where ‘whole children’ are split into silos. This approach is not holistic, not integrated and is contrary to the future shape cross cutting theme being adopted across other Directorate restructures. 

In our restructure we have noted that a number of services that were included in Policy, Performance and Planning are currently being transferred in to the Future Shape Support organisation. We see this as an opportunity in terms of the current capacity for development of a coordinated, integrated commissioning structure.

Message to our members working on Education teams in Children’s Services.

We have not had much response from our members working in the Education/Schools teams and would strongly urge our members to read and send in your comments.

We urge members to share this DRAFT with colleagues, discuss in team meetings and send any comments to john.burgess@barnetunison.org.uk by Friday 23rd April 2010.

Future Shape – Who takes the Risk?

The biggest costs for any organisation public or private are staff costs. That is why staff are quite rightly concerned when they hear they could be transferred out of the Council into another organisation.  

When staff are transferred out of the council what are the risks for those staff?

We commissioned a report to look at the risks to staff if they are transferred out of the Council under Secondment, TUPE Plus, TUPE arrangements.

To view the report click here

fit notes not sick notes?

On the 6 April, fit notes replaced the current medical statement that is used by GPs to sign people off work. The fit note will give a doctor three options, the third of which is new. Those options will indicate if a patient is:

·        fit for work;

·        not fit for work;

·        may be fit for some work.

If the doctor indicates that the patient may be fit for some work, they can then elaborate by indicating that employees may, with their employer’s agreement, benefit from:

·        a phased return to work;

·        altered hours;

·        amended duties;

·        workplace adaptations.

The Council have produced a guide which you can read here or find on the council intranet.

TOP SECRET – National Unity Government Plans

As I was marching with the Barnet UNISON banner pass Whitehall on Saturday I had a piece of paper pushed into my hand. I am not sure it is genuine but none of the mainstream parties appear to be saying anything about job cuts, despite the fact less than 6 months ago they were calling for savage cuts to jobs, pensions.

There have been rumours that an emergency budget would be called after the General Election. It is disappointing that politicians are frightened to say what they are planning for fear they won’t be elected.

Anyway have a look at this!

Barnet UNISON on march to Protect our Welfare State and Public Services

Barnet UNISON marched with Barnet Sheltered Housing residents and thousands of others

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8613236.stmThe coffin which symbolised the axing of on site wardens proved popular with journalists. BBC Panorama turned up to interview some of the residents. For those who are not familar with this campaign. The Council in last years budegt proposed axing on site wardens. Barnet Community Campaign challenged the decision at a Judicial Review and won!